Showing posts with label mercedes-benz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mercedes-benz. Show all posts

Friday, June 12, 2009

McLaren/Mercedes GP Season From Hell

McLaren/Mercedes GP Season From Hell



You could start by saying something biblical, like the lord giveth, and the lord taketh away but it’s actually more prosaic than that. McLaren/Mercedes has been having a hell of a season (in a bad way) in this year’s grand prix competition. And this past weekends race at Turkey is one of their worst in memory.


A lot of people are scratching their heads, but the actual reason as to why things are so bad and why they’re getting whopped is a little more easily understood and prosaic.



The thumbnail sketch goes like this:


McLaren/Mercedes, one of the best grand prix racing teams out there, and the defending champions of the drivers title have been completely lost at sea since the drop of the flag at the first race of the year in Australia. It’s nothing specifically wrong, it’s everything. No grip, no speed, no straight-line acceleration, and they’ve been trying to get a handle on the new KERS system, and that hasn’t been so good either.


McLaren has not been alone, though. Doing only slightly better is last year’s constructor’s champions, Ferrari. And there in lies one of the reasons why McLaren is having such a bad time of it this year.


Most importantly, there have been a whole new raft of rules implemented for the ‘09 round of the Grand Prix World Championship. Slick tires are back, there’s huge aero changes (bigger front wing, much smaller rear, “simplified” underbody etc.), and you can now run a KERS (Kinetic Energy recovery System) hybrid drive if you’d like. Any one of these would have meant a lot of time and trouble for a team, but McLaren are big enough to handle that. All of the changes combined though, that’s a pretty steep hill to climb … And McLaren (along with Ferrari) didn’t start trying to climb it until way late in the game.


See, the two teams were so damn busy trying to knock the stuffing out of one another last year (the titles weren’t decided until literally the last corner of the last lap of the last race), that they didn’t get started on the 2009 cars (the ones with all the changes) until very, very late in the game.


That’s strike one.



The other bad news is that some of their competition, most noticeably Red Bull, Toyota and “newcomers” Brawn, had been working on their ‘09 cars for a long while. Brawn, in particular, have been working on their car since May of 2008. But that was when Brawn was known as Honda, and Honda’s ‘08 season was going so bad, they simply threw in the towel on the whole season, and literally said, ‘Screw it! We’ll just start working on the 2009 car instead.’


That’s strike two.


And on top of all this, most of the teams looked at the new-for-09 rules and said, “OK, the new underbody has to look like XXX.” Toyota and, most significantly Brawn, looked at the rules as they were written, and saw a HUGE loophole and built a very smart diffuser design.


That’s strike three.


It’s not so much that McLaren came up with a bad design, it’s that the competition came up with a better one. McLaren didn’t fail so much as the others have succeeded.


Ah well, so it goes in the racing world. Keep on boys. Look at it as a development year, and concentrate on what the 2010 car should be.


Here’s the McLaren/Mercedes presser (being as upbeat as they can):


GP Türkei: Lewis Hamilton and Heikki Kovalainen 13th and 1414

Stuttgart, Jun 07, 2009


LEWIS HAMILTON

MP4-24-04

Started: 16th Finished: 13th

Fastest lap: 1m28.662s (15th) Pitstops: one (Pr-Op)

Championship points: 9 Championship pos: 11th

Starting with a heavily fuelled car, Lewis was unable to start the race aggressively and slotted into 17th. Adopting a single-stop strategy from the off, he pushed hard throughout, always maximising the car’s potential and, by virtue of passing the two-stopping cars pitting ahead of him, worked his way up to 10th before making his sole pitstop on lap 32. Switching from the Prime to the Option tyre, he rejoined in 16th, was passed by Nelson Piquet but put in another strong stint to recover to 13th by the chequer.

“It was quite an uneventful race but I actually enjoyed myself this afternoon,” Lewis said. “I was very heavy at the start but I just pushed and pushed. That’s why I can smile – because I think I drove to my full potential.

“The most important thing is for us to keep our heads up and to keep pushing. I see my role from now on as helping the team to cure the problems with this year’s car and to make next year’s car the best it can possibly be. When the team gives me a car to win, I will win.

“Now we look ahead to Silverstone – I really wish Jenson all the best: he did a fantastic job today. Personally, I hope I can come away from my home race with a great feeling from my home fans. I hope they won’t give up supporting me.”


HEIKKI KOVALAINEN

MP4-24-03

Started: 14th Finished: 14th

Fastest lap: 1m29.174s (18th) Pitstops: two (Op-Pr-Op)

Championship points: 4 Championship pos: 13th

Making a strong start, Heikki was able to slot into 11th by the end of the first lap, settling into an enthralling cat-and-mouse battle with Rubens Barrichello, who had slipped down the order at the start. Defending hard against the faster car, Heikki continually stayed ahead of Rubens, using his KERS to push back past on the startline after Rubens had nosed ahead out of the final corner. The dice concluded on lap eight when Rubens attempted to look up the inside into Turn Nine and the pair touched, pitching Heikki into a brief tank-slapper and Rubens into a harmless spin.

Thereafter, Heikki pitted on laps 19 and 42 and ran to the chequer in 14th after the team elected to reduce his engine settings to preserve the Mercedes-Benz motor.

“This was a character-building race for everybody in the team,” Heikki said afterwards. “At the start of the race, I really got the maximum out of the car and I’m pleased about that. I had a good fight with Rubens too – it was great to be racing hard and fair and it was very satisfying to keep a faster car at bay with some good old-fashioned racing tactics and also our KERS hybrid.

“In the final stint, the engineers elected to turn down the revs to protect my engine. Still, we have to be realistic: we finished 14th and we all know we can do better. We’ve had some great days in the past and we’ll continue to push hard to enjoy some great days in the future.”


MARTIN WHITMARSH

Team principal, Vodafone McLaren Mercedes

“In extremely frustrating circumstances, both Lewis and Heikki performed very impressively this afternoon. They both tried their hardest throughout the race, and we’re grateful for their sterling efforts. Of course, it’s frustrating that two such forceful drives went unrewarded in terms of world championship points, but the fact is that our car just isn’t as quick as we’d like it to be. So, now, we’ll go back to Woking and we’ll work hard to rectify its deficiencies, but there’s no magic cure. No, instead, the remedy will be found via hard work, and one thing our team isn’t afraid of is hard work – which, it goes without saying, I’m also extremely grateful for. But, returning to the subject of today’s race, the fact that Rubens, in an extremely competitive car, was unable to make anything of his afternoon once he’d got bogged down at the start, demonstrates all too clearly that, in modern-day Formula 1, as close-fought as it is, it’s more or less impossible to make useful progress from the back of the field. That may be frustrating, but it’s true nonetheless.”


NORBERT HAUG

Vice-president, Mercedes-Benz Motorsport

“We knew that this type of circuit would be difficult for us. Whereas the car works okay in sector three with its long straightaway and tight corners where we are as quick as anybody, we struggle massively on the quick parts of this racetrack. We have to make fundamental improvements and everybody in the team is aware of that. Thanks to Lewis and Heikki who both drove faultless races and extracted the maximum from their cars.

“The Brawn car and Jenson Button are in a league of their own – so none of their competitors can currently be satisfied and certainly we least. Congratulations for the sixth win from Jenson in the seventh race of the season and a big thank you to our engine guys who have put in a perfect effort so far.”


© Gearhead Media - Please visit Automoblog.net for more great content.

NCE Mercedes-Benz CL AMG Convertible

The NCE is offering a convertible version of Mercedes-Benz CL AMG Coupe. Below are some of the pictures.


NCE Mercedes-Benz CL AMG Convertible


NCE Mercedes-Benz CL AMG Convertible


NCE Mercedes-Benz CL AMG Convertible


NCE Mercedes-Benz CL AMG Convertible


NCE Mercedes-Benz CL AMG Convertible




Related posts:

  1. MERCEDES-BENZ Car Price Online
  2. 2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe
  3. 2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class - BlueEFFICIENCY

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class AMG Convertible Conversion

Mercedes-Benz CL-Class AMG Convertible Conversion
With every passing year, there seems to be more convertibles on the market. But if you live in a sunny clime like California's, enough sunshine is never enough. That's where convertible chop-shops like Newport Convertible Engineering step in. The folks at NCE will take just about any automobile and turn it into a custom cabrio to a buyer's specifications. The company's portfolio includes recent conversions of a Dodge Challenger, Toyota Prius, Cadillac CTS, Hummer H2, Toyota FJ Cruiser, and this Mercedes-Benz CL AMG. Unfortunately, from the photos seen here, the soft top doesn't seem to collapse quite flush with the rear deck, leaving something to be desired in terms of aesthetics – to say nothing of rearward visibility. Here's hoping there's a snug-fitting cover lurking in whatever trunkspace remains.

More Pics ---> Auto Blog
Mercedes-Benz CL-Class AMG Convertible Conversion

Friday, May 29, 2009

Pojas glavu čuva

Pojas glavu čuvaAko niste pravilno vezani, tada vam ni vazdušni jastuci, ni sva ostala sigurnosna oprema (deformacione zone, sigurnosni kavez itd.) neće pomoći. To je pokazalo testiranje nemačkog ADAC-a, u kojem su istovremeno sprovedeni testovi na dva Golf-a 2.0 TDI, s lutkama za testiranje. U jednom vozilu su svi bili propisno vezani, a u drugom je simulirana situacija kada vozač nije vezan, a dete ne sedi u stolici predviđenoj za to ili uopšte nije vezano.


Crash test je sproveden prema standardu Euro-NCAP, pri brzini od 64 km/h, uz 40-postotno preklapanje. Takav test simulira najopasniji frontalni sudar, u kojem i strada najviše osoba u saobraćaju. U slučaju pravilnog vezivanja pokazalo se da tada ne bi došlo do povreda, to jest vozač i putnici bi prošli bez povrede. “Osobe” koje se u istom automobilu u istim uslovima nisu vezale ili su sedele nepropisno zadobile su teške i po život opasne povrede.


Time je potvrđeno ono na šta stručnjaci dugo upozoravaju: vazdušni jastuk nije dovoljan, jer ako vozač ili suvozač nisu vezani, tada vazdušni jastuk ni približno nije od koristi, a u određenim okolnostima može povećati opasnost od teških povreda. Posebno su ugrožene osobe niskog rasta i deca, kod kojih eksplozivno naduvavanje vazdušnog jastuka može izazvati teške povrede glave.


pojas glavu cuva 2 300x225 Pojas glavu čuvaPrvi sigurnosni pojas fiksiran u tri tačke ugrađen je pre više od pola veka, 1958. godine, u modelu Volvo 121 Amazon. Taj sistem ubrzo je postao standard, a masovna ugradnja počela je krajem šezdesetih godina, što je doprinelo sigurnosti. Zatezači smanjuju pravu snagu udara. Svi novi automobili opremljeni su zatezačima programiranog zatezanja. Naime, prvi sigurnosni pojasevi su bili kruti, pa su povećavali povrede grudnog koša i trzajne povrede vrata. Zbog toga su pojasevi spojeni elastično, kako bi smanjili dinamički udar, a posle toga pirotehnički zatezači povećavaju silu zatezanja, kako ne bi došlo do udara tela o ram automobila ili upravljač.


Ovim sistemom upravlja elektronika koja reaguje na informacije koje dobija od senzora dinamičkog udara. Mercedes-Benz je pre deset godina projektovao sistem Presafe, koji u situaciji kad je sudar siguran zateže sigurnosne pojaseve, kako bi se vozač pripremio na udar. Ispitivanja su pokazala da se time rizik teških povreda može smanjiti za više od 30 odsto.


Izvor:  Internet Krstarica

2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe

The 2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe is powered by the BRABUS 6.1 litre, four valve V8 enigine which produce 462 hp (456 bhp)/340 kW and maximum torque of 615 Nm at just 3,100 rpm. It can go from 0-100 km/h in 4.7 seconds with top speed of 315km/h.


2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe


2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe


2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe


2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe


2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe


2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe


2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe


2010 BRABUS Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe


 




Related posts:

  1. 2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class - BlueEFFICIENCY
  2. MERCEDES E-CLASS Spyshot
  3. MERCEDES-BENZ Car Price Online

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Lorinser Mercedes Benz GLK

Lorinser Mercedes Benz GLK


The German tuning specialists Lorinser chose the all new 2010 Mercedes Benz GLK to customize the exterior alone. The new GLK from Mercedes is anticipated to be the next model to start a fashion statement among the SUV class, so Lorinser decided to make it look even better. They added the Swabian body kit which gives the SUV a more aggressive look while keeping the high class feel. Included in the kit is a new front bumper, side skirts, a spoiler in the rear along with a new rear bumper to accommodate the exhaust system.


Lorinser also added their lightweight alloy wheels which come in several different designs for the customer. Their RS 8 wheel for example is designed to have a turbine blade look when moving. This is the one SUV you want if you prefer luxury, looks, and agility for the city touring life.


Lorinser Mercedes Benz GLKLorinser Mercedes Benz GLKLorinser Mercedes Benz GLK


[Source: Lorinser]

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]

No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]The just-announced fuel economy policy changes demand 42 MPG for cars and 27 MPG for light trucks. A look at the data shows not a single automaker currently meets the new guidelines proposed today.


Using the Model-Year 2009 Fleet Fuel Economy standards provided by the National Highway Safety Transportation Administration (NHTSA), we determined the current ratings for passenger cars and light trucks and compared them to the goal for each of the greater automakers selling cars in the U.S. A few automakers, probable KIA and Hyundai, report their given conditions separately since of a different ownership arrangement. We also took a look at what barriers exist for them reaching those standards.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


BMW


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 27.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -14.5 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 23.1 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -3.9 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: BMW currently offers no hybrid or electric vehicles and, as a matter of practice, has been increasing displacement not decreasing it. The use of diesel engines is a step in the right direction but they’re source behind where they destitution to be.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Chrysler


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 28.3 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -13.7 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 23.9 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -3.1 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Chrysler’s biggest problem, in general, is the lack of appealing small cars with good fuel economy. Lacking any realistic vehicle put on the horizon, the Chrysler-FIAT deal was envisioned to solve this issue. Let’s see how that works out for them.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Daimler


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 27.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -14.5 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 20.6 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -6.4 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Mercedes-Benz may have to reconsider its policy of bringing over G-wagens and GL-wagens if it doesn’t want to pay a refine, as the light truck numbers are low. The company has hinted at a smaller, possibly marked by electricity, model to bring up the average mileage but how many electric smarts do you need to overweigh an AMG G55?


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Ford


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 31.1 MPG (excluding foreign import)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -10.9 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 24.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -2.3 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Ford sells a lot of trucks. Despite fluctuations in combustibles prices, the F-Series is bread + butter in favor of the company. The adding of EcoBoost should help propel passenger vehicles to a higher overall value, and rumors of similar turbo’ed engines in the pickups should help as abundantly.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


GM


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 31.3 MPG (excluding foreign import)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -10.7 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 22.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -4.5 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Barriers? What Barriers? The Volt will save everything… right? GM could be a victim of its own success if it turns out they start selling far more Camaros than hybrids and other fuel efficient vehicles.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Honda


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 36.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -5.5 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 26.2 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -0.8 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Honda typically ranks highest amidst brands, with equal reason they’re doing pretty well. But maybe now we know why they keep delaying the NSX.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Hyundai


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 33.2 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -8.8 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 25.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -1.3 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Unlike most Asian brands, Hyundai has picked up steam through moving away from greener vehicles. WIll the Genesis sedan and coupe cut into the gains made by their dinky little Korean hatches?


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Kia


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 33.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -8.3 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 24.4 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -2.6 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Kia has human being big barrier to better fuel economy and it’s the Kia Borrego. Since not any some seems to want the $40K truck we don’t see Kia having a hard time satirical it out of the lineup.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Mazda


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 32.2/31.0 MPG (Import/Domestic)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -9.8 MPG/11 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 26.6 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -0.4 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: The only hybrid vehicle in the Mazda lineup is a rebadged Ford Escape and, so far as we know, diesel hasn’face to face been considered an option. While the Mazda3 gets good mileage it’s at all times placed Zoom-Zoom over glug-glug.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Mitsubishi


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 29.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -12.5 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 26.1 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -0.9 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: The single saving grace for Mitsubishi, as it languishes in the U.S., is the iMiev full of fire car. But can the company produce enough electrics and hold outright long enough to make it economically feasible?


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Nissan


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 30.1/34.0 MPG (Import/Domestic)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -11.9 MPG/ 8.0 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 23.5 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -3.5 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Nissan has built a reputation around their VQ V6 and don’t seem intent on taking it out of somewhat of their vehicles. To balance this, they’ll try to use the Nissan Cube and other small cars, but they’ll have to do more fully than the also-ran Sentra


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Porsche


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 27.0 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -15.0 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 19.3 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -7.7 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Porsche has historically been more content to pay fees than reform their ways given they’re a work brand. The lucrative Cayenne, as well, presents a challenge. They could combine with VW to raise the Porsche medium, but at the price of lowering VW’s.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Subaru


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 29.0 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -13.0 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 28.4 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -1.4 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Subaru builds cars disproportionately more fun than you’d look forward to and the popularity of vehicles preference the WRX and the lack of a small, under-powered economy car is a threat to the brand’s overall mileage. Could we see the return of the Justy hatchback?


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Suzuki


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 32.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -9.3 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 25.7 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -1.3 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: The current Suzuki lineup is such random and confusing it’s hard to know where they could doings. With the affront of the SX4 and Grand Vitara there aren’t any products with much note recognition. Just scrap the whole thing and gain us the Cappuccino.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


Toyota


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 38.1/35.9 MPG (Import/Domestic)
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -3.9 MPG/6.1 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 25.8 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -1.2 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Unless Toyota discontinues the Prius and decides to frame the Tacoma V8-only, the automaker is moving in the right direction. Let’s just hope this doesn’t torpedo plans for a unused Supra although we fear it might.


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


VW


2009 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 30.2 MPG
Distance From 2016 Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: -11.8 MPG
2009 Light Truck Fleet Fuel Economy Rating: 23.9 MPG
Distance From 2016 Light Truck Fuel Economy Rating: -3.1 MPG
Barriers To Meeting New Fuel Economy Ratings: Volkswagen’s greatest environmental asset is the TDI engine. It’s greatest weakness is the haughty price of diesel fuel and the possibility of Americans turning on their technology. The greatest barrier on the horizon is Porsche, so we have power to’t imagine them combining.




Conclusion


Not a single automaker popularly meets 2016 standards for combustible matter economy. In passenger cars, only Toyota and Honda, who have larger fleets of fuel-efficient cars are less than 10 MPG not present from the proposed standards. This means companies will each have to radically alter their lineups, reduce the production of vehicles we actually want to drive, or invest heavily in choice propulsion systems at a time when their involving death is severely constrained. Good hazard with that! Appliance vehicles, here we advance!


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]


No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]



No Automakers Meet Obama’s New Fuel Economy Standard [I Feel Gassy]

AVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG

AVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG


After the translation incident with ‘White Power’, AVUS Performance has returned again, this time modifying a Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG. The German car tuning company did everything to this Mercedes, from suspension, to looks, and also performance options to give it the complete package. The springs were replaced with aftermarket parts, and coilovers are an option for the customer. Complementing the new height are 19 inch AMG multi-spoke rims, with large 8-piston brake calipers and 380 mm rotors to bring it to a stop. Under the hood however is where AVUS excels, supporting three different power stages, and letting the owner choose their destiny.


This current model of the Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG tuned by AVUS Performance packs a stage 3, capable of producing 585 bhp and 740 Nm of torque. Depending on the tires fitted, it can reach a max speed of 320 km/h with this stage 3 kit. The exterior received upgrades as well, such as mirror covers, new front grille painted black along with the roof, and an aftermarket performance exhaust system.


AVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMGAVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMGAVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG


AVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMGAVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMGAVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG


AVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMGAVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMGAVUS Performance Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG


[Source: Press Release]

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...